Tuesday 8 April 2014

11 points that think football is a pleasant game...


1. "It's over for the little guy." Patsy Parisi, The Sopranos.

There is a typically poignant moment in the Sopranos episode ‘Johnny Cakes’ when two mobsters visit their local Starbucks to offer ‘protection’. The store manager is nonplussed and simply refers them to his area manager, before warning every dollar must now be accounted for. The mobsters, bemused, scratch their heads and realise “this thing of ours” has changed forever. Nothing withstands the test of time. Everything must adapt if it wants to survive and thrive. Including Manchester United. We have nobly (or naively) attempted to cling to an ideal seen as obsolete by the rest of Europe. For years we have railed against agents’ payments, inflated salaries and transfer fees. When it came to replacing Ferguson we rejected Europe’s top coaches in favour of David Moyes and a seemingly more traditional approach to management. We sought to give Moyes the previous manager’s paintbrush and canvas because that was, after all, how Ferguson painted his masterpiece. But the canvas was no longer blank. Times have changed and the game has moved on. Since we last spoke we have beaten Palace, West Ham, West Brom, Villa and Newcastle. In between came the atrocity in Athens followed by the most fortunate 3-0 victory I have ever seen. Actually that’s not true – we were extremely fortunate to lose only 3-0 to both Liverpool and City. Now we have a second leg against Europe’s finest side having conceded an away goal. Only victory will save our season. A season that has proven us hopelessly out of touch - both on and off the pitch. And all because we wanted to recreate what we had under Ferguson. The principles that existed when Ferguson was appointed in 1986 are not prevalent in 2014. That is sad. And I admire those who rail against moral decline. But there’s a difference between standing up for what you believe in and getting in the way of progress. We are currently on the wrong side of that line. Unless we invest heavily from the academy to the management structure, the first team and beyond, we will be left behind, forever cast as noble outsiders standing up for what we believe regardless of consequences. The game has changed. It's over for the little guy.

--

2. Where there’s a will there’s a United way.
There’s a Simpsons episode in which Bart responds to every verbal attack with “so’s your face”. It’s enough to drive his aggressor insane. United fans have their own ‘so’s your face’. Ours is ‘stability, continuity, tiiiiiiime’. You don’t even need logic or supporting arguments. Try it. “Moyes is a clueless twerp.” Stability. “Moyes hasn’t picked the right team once.” Long term. “Moyes shouldn’t have sacked the coaching staff.” Eeeerrr continuity? These words may offer comfort to some but they are, rather unfortunately, just words. They are not – as is so often argued – building blocks of the famous ‘United Way’. And just what is this much-vaunted United way? Is it fast fluent football? Is this a preserve of Man United? Do Madrid therefore play the United way? Lucky them. Are Liverpool currently playing the United way? Christ what a thought. It is a total farce to think that fast, attractive football is a right we as fans ought to expect. It’s also a fallacy to think that only fast, attacking football brings happiness. You’re ahead in a European Cup semi final with twenty minutes to go – do you commit men forwards, playing without abandon? As your opposition picks you apart on the break do you applaud the gung-ho nature of your side? I think not. The United way is a rather redundant, misunderstood and, frankly, childish concept. I feel sorry for the fan that hasn’t realised everything Ferguson did was about winning, not about the preservation of some mythical philosophy born from the ashes of Munich. The Barcelona master plan (semi final 2008), the Battle of Old Trafford (2004 variant), Butt over Scholes in Turin (99) – were these examples of the United way? Or were they decisions made to get the job done? In a season of 60 games how often do you play well? I’d say no more than 10-15. Some games you have good spells, others you simply dig out results. This is the United way. This is the winning way. And for that you can compromise on skill and flair – but never guts and determination. Whether they’re chasing a game, or trying to hold on to a lead, watching a team put their neck on the line is a fully exhilarating, visceral experience. It is football. It’s not about playing a certain way, or getting people off their seats for 90 minutes - it’s about winning. And winning is about courage, determination and leadership. Moyes’s issue is not that we don’t play attacking football – it’s that we play anemic football. We are gutless. We have no right to victory, no ownership over ‘attacking football’ and no guarantee that our players will put their body on the line from one game to the next. The United way has many different forms. Moyes needs to uncover at least one.

--

3. We’re Man United, so f***ing what?
“We’re Man United for Christ’s sake!" How can we not have {INSERT POSITION THAT OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN RESOLVED IN ANY OF THE PAST 10 TRANSFER WINDOWS}?” When Buttner plays fans are up in arms that we don’t have a spare left back. When Rafael is injured, they wonder how we can only have one specialist right back? What about centre mids? Centre forwards? And so on. We talk a lot about being the biggest club in Europe but we don’t act like it. Certainly the Glazers have done very little to demonstrate they’re serious about owning the best team in Europe. The chronic lack of investment since the Ronaldo sale is one thing, but the distinct lack of ambition in the investments we have made is another. Valencia from Wigan, Young from Villa, Fellaini from Planet Zod – it hardly smacks of the biggest club in Europe does it? We have bought into our own hype. After all, when have we ever dominated the transfer market? In terms of net profits (and percentage of revenues) we are not big spenders. In the 90s Blackburn and Newcastle out bid and out spent us. Come the 21st century Abramovich took spending to a whole new level before the wealth of the middle east arrived through Sheikh Monsour. And what of our ‘European rivals’? Madrid spent £30mil on a reserve left back (Coentrao) and another £25million on a fifth choice midfielder (Illllllaramiendi). They’re playing a totally different game. Our aim is to produce from within and buy young, outstanding talent. That’s fine. But we’ve even stopped doing that. Since we invested in Nani and Anderson which young game-changing talent have we invested in? Have we spent over £10 million on a player outside the Premier League since Hargreaves? Now, big spending has its own pitfalls – it isn’t the answer to everything. But any team that replaces Paul Scholes with Marouane Fellaini is not taking this seriously. We replaced Ronaldo with Valencia, Tevez with Owen, Rio and Vida with Smalling and Evans while Ryan Giggs is still the best left-sided midfielder at the club (OK maybe Adnan). The only serious attempt we have made to replace a world-class performer is De Gea for Van Der Saar. Without doubt the club had their hands burnt with Veron. Post-Edwards they will point to Berbatov as proof that value doesn’t exist at the top end of the market. But the real problem is we’ve done very little in between to develop world-class talent. Manchester City were going to lose the Carling Cup final before Toure’s intervention. That’s what world class players do. They change the course of history. And though we may have a glorious past, until we acquire some talent of our own, the one thing we can be certain of is a fairly uneventful future.

--

4. “Some things in life are bad…”
When Paul Lake was stretchered off during Mike Duxbury’s testimonial, Old Trafford serenaded him with a rendition of “Always look on the bright side of life.” In fact, for years, the Monty Python classic was the ground’s most recognisable anthem. It was full of irony and sung with a knowing smile. We weren’t very good but we’d live to fight another day. When Liverpool foiled our title chances in 1992 they sang our anthem back at us. What followed was a devastating 20-year domination in which we didn’t need irony. We didn’t even need a great sense of humour – because everything was funny. As United went from strength to strength, Liverpool floundered and City slumped to division two. Looking on the bright side of life became second nature. So much so we didn’t need to sing it anymore. Well now here we are. And we’re going to need our sense of humour more than ever. Without it the next few years will feel like an eternity. So for old time’s sake, all together now! “De de de de de de de de.”

--

5. United top of the (away) league!
Stats can be misleading. That United have the ‘best’ away record in the Premier League is a tremendous example of the facts amounting to an outright lie. Beating all the teams in the bottom half has totally distorted the figures. In the games that actually mattered we barely turned up let alone recorded victory. City hammered us, Liverpool beat us, Chelsea embarrassed us and we failed to lay a glove on the most insipid Arsenal side of all time. We drew at Spurs and have yet to play Everton and Southampton at their respective grounds. To say this away league table is misleading is an understatement. It is entirely irrelevant. There’s only one table that means anything and in that we remain, as we have all season, 7th.

--

6. There’s no ‘I’ in Rooney
In a recent (and brilliant) piece Peter Oborne (Daily Telegraph) wrote about the rise of the neo-liberal in our society. “Neo-liberals”, Oborne wrote, “regard community, place and nation as worthless superstitions. Above all, they place the individual first.” The subject of his piece was Kevin Pietersen but equally it could have been Wayne Rooney. Footballers have always been a selfish bunch but the past ten years has seen an unprecedented rise in player power. The result has been the terminal decline of team spirit. The idea of a common cause has been trampled on with everyone out for themselves. Individuals such as Rooney aggressively demand what’s theirs at the expense of harmony and community. It’s hard to resent Wayne Rooney (and agents) for recognising his commercial worth. I don’t begrudge him his huge contract. Has he been playing well? Yes, I suppose. Do the team need him? Yes. Was his contract up for renewal? Yes. All boxes ticked. But that’s Rooney - forever box-ticking. All lip service and no heart. No one can claim that Rooney lives an breaths the cause as Bruce, Robson and Keane once did. Rooney doesn’t care about Man United anymore than you or I care about our local amateur dramatics society. If they offer us the main part we’ll take it, if not we’ll move on. At the start of the season he let us all know he would maintain a level of professionalism – but he wouldn’t enjoy it. Like the kid who is forced to say sorry, the words come out, but the eyes are a giveaway. He would run around a lot, he would work hard for the team but he would do it devoid of any joy. With the world watching in August (home to Chelsea), he went for a speculative piledriver instead of slipping in Van Persie. The English media is wowed – he forced a save from 30 yards – Moyes is beaming, but something is wrong. When did proving a point become more important than winning three? And that is the neo-liberal for you. Wayne Rooney. A technically gifted player, the darling of a generation, he ticks all the boxes. He knows how to say the right things. He sometimes even does the right thing. I just can’t help but feel it’s always for the wrong reason.

--

7.  Decisions, decisions, decisions.
Ferguson relished having a big squad because he knew the worth of every single player. Moyes is inhibited by it. He doesn’t know his players at all. Since day one he has proven completely incapable of managing a large group of international players. What’s more, he has shown no improvement as the season’s worn on. Which is just as well because, ahead of the Munich game, there is no squad to choose from. RVP is injured, Mata is ineligible, several defenders are out and even Fellaini is crocked. He will be forced to play the hand he’s been dealt. So that means no inexplicable dropping of Welbeck, no Mata on the right at the expense of Valencia’s pace and no constant tinkering at centre half. His only choice will be whether to restore Evra at Buttner’s expense. And if that’s the extent of the decisions he has to make then surely, even Moyes can’t get this one wrong.

--

8. Words.

 “Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind.” R. Kipling.

Moyes is clearly on drugs. That’s something we all know. But he hasn’t been intoxicated by the power of words, as Kipling references. And more’s the pity. True leaders understand the power of words. They know words can manipulate, they can enchant, they convince, they wound and they save. They are weapons that destroy and remedies that heal. History connects our leaders with the words they say as much as with the things they do. Churchill, Ghandi, Martin Luther King Jr. – their achievements are encapsulated in the historic sound bites that live on today. Moyes has not grasped that people are inspired by words. When he talks to the camera he thinks he’s talking to the people at home. He is a fool. He has not realised he’s actually talking to his players. Every conversation he has, every interview he gives and every statement he makes should be calculated for the players’ ears. He does not have to give the Sermon on the Mount but he has to understand that his players are looking for a leader. They ought to be hanging on every word he says but at the moment he’s not worth listening to. He’s told them they’re not good enough, that they lack world class talent, that there’s going to be changes, that their old coaches weren’t up to it and that everything they thought they knew was wrong. When Brian Clough told the Leeds players to throw their medals in the bin at least he looked them in the eye. Moyes has taken the coward’s route and done it through the press. It’s no wonder the dressing room harmony previously the envy of world football has gone. We are looking for a leader and we have an apologist. And it’s bizarre because it’s so easy. After all if you say the right things often enough, maybe – just maybe, people will believe you. But Moyes won’t even do that. Well he’ll have to learn because if he calls Liverpool favourites again or tells the world we “aspire” to Manchester City there’ll be no words left to save him. And when he looks back at his career he’ll do well to ruminate on these all-too-true-words:

“Of all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these, 'It might have been.”
 John Greenleaf Whittier.

--

9. The truth is out there.
Some people want to know who shot JFK (spoiler alert - it was Lee Harvey Oswald). Others want to know what really happened to Tony Soprano (another spoiler alert – he was killed in the cafĂ©). Me and 750million United fans (official club data) would like to know exactly what Fergie meant in his speech about “backing the new manager”. What was seen as a fairly benign phrase has taken on a whole new meaning since that historic day. It has conspiracy theorists in a flat spin. Did he mean, “the club is in bad shape, this is going to be a long road back under a new and relatively inexperienced manager so he’ll need your support (aside Moyes is only a few years younger than Ancelotti. Amazing, I know)? Or did he mean, “support him because that’s what nice people do”? Was he even talking to the fans? Maybe it was a cryptic message to the Glazers? Or maybe it was just something he said. After all, Ferguson claimed that he improvised that famous speech on the advice of his son. But can we really believe that? With Ferguson, was not every word calculated? As with all mysteries, the temptation is to analyse minute detail to see patterns that don’t exist. And when things don’t add up after seemingly regular events, conspiracy theories abound. It may not quite be our ‘who shot JFK’ moment, but as with other such historical ambiguities, the truth may never be uncovered.

--

10. Are you not entertained?
It is common consensus that if attendances plummet, if season tickets are not renewed and if the fans revolt, Moyes will get the sack. You couldn’t make it up. For all the issues that fans have campaigned about over the years including ticket prices, mistreatment at grounds, anti-social kick off times etc. now the Glazers want to hear from us. You could not make it up. Because the club (may) have chosen the wrong manager, but no one within the club is willing or able to do anything about it, they’re putting this on the fans reaction. Thanks but no thanks. While I will hardly cheer Moyes (there’s not been much to cheer frankly) nor will I stand their jeering, taking cheap shots at a man doing his best (even if it’s not good enough). Either the Glazers believe he’s the right man for the job or they don’t. But if they’re waiting for a gladiatorial thumbs up or down moment from the crowd then something is seriously wrong. But then we knew that already.

--

11. Is Ryan Giggs.
And if it comes down to a choice between him and Moyes then it isn’t really a choice at all.